Clarifying user needs

I’m thinking we shouldn’t use the internet unless the user asks for it, especially since the network status is uncertain. It doesn’t seem necessary right now. Instead, I should give a brief response to ask what the user really wants: Are they looking for a reliability check, background on certain players, tactical fit, or information about possible swap pieces? I'll keep my response concise to make it easier for them.Short analysis creation

I’m preparing a brief analysis for the user. First, source reliability: Daily Mail has mixed reviews on transfer rumors, so I’ll approach with caution. Regarding Sesko, his release clause of 60-65 million will be active this summer, and Leipzig prefers cash over swaps. Man Utd faces PSR/FFP constraints, making swaps accounting-friendly but a sale of Hojlund unexpected. I’ll address player fit, alternatives, and conclude with likelihood probabilities. Lastly, I'll ask the user what they prefer—more details, numbers, or comparisons—and respond in Chinese, keeping it concise with bullet points.

几点快评：

• 可信度：英媒“邮报”转会传闻命中率一般，先观望，别把它当定论。
• 谢什科情况：2024年和莱比锡续约，外界多次报道有约6000–6500万欧左右的解约条款（多为夏窗生效）。莱比锡一贯更偏现金，球员交换成功率不高。
• 与霍伊伦：两人风格有重叠（高个、冲击、反击威胁、禁区终结），霍伊伦是俱乐部重点培养对象，赛季中被“交易”的动机和成本都很高，真实可行性存疑。真要操作，更可能是分开处理的两笔账而非直接互换。
• 财务面：曼联受PSR/FFP约束，“钱+球员”能改善账面，但莱比锡对接手高薪或非德甲型球员意愿不强。
• 技战术：谢什科背身、做球和无球点位感稍占优；霍伊伦纵深冲刺、压迫积极性更突出。若两人并存，可做轮换与不同对手的方案；用一个换一个，收益不明显。
• 结论：这类方案目前看更多是市场试水与媒体放风，短期落地概率偏低；若真冲刺谢什科，最现实路径仍是以现金为主。

需要我：1) 做两人的数据对比雷达/视频特征概览，2) 盘点曼联可用于置换的球员与莱比锡匹配度，3) 评估不同交易结构对PSR影响，选一个？